Sunday, March 27, 2011

photogenic drawing

Photogenic drawing is a type of contact printing in the history of photography.  It was invented by William Henry Fox Talbot, a gentleman scientist, which he announced in 1839.  Paper is immersed with salt solution, NaCl and distilled water, and then allowed to dry.  Silver nitrate is then brushed on the sheet of paper.  A chemical reaction occurs in the paper to produce silver chloride, making the paper light sensitive.  When an object is placed on top of the paper (contact) and then exposed to light, the uncovered sections will darken and a light image is left.  Until the image is fixed on to the page, the image can darken to the surroundings and disappear.  The negative image can be fixed by immersing the paper a salt saturated solution – the salt prevents the silver from reacting further. 

John Herschel picked up Talbot’s research and came up with a new method for fixing the image to the page.  His hypo fixer (sodium thiosulpahate) dissolves away silver nitrate and became the standard for all silver processes.

The exposure time can vary, depending on the quality of light and the solution concentrations.  In bright sunlight, the image will appear faster.  However, in other light, it may take several minutes to appear.  In our experiments where photosensitive paper was exposed in light boxes we left the images exposed for about five minutes. Though unknown, further exposure may have proven to darken the images.  

The solution concentrations effect the outcome of the images.  For our experiment, we used two concentrations of salt solution, 2% and 10%, and two concentrations of silver solution, 5% and 12%, and four types of paper.  Using every combination on each paper:
2% Salt, 5% Silver
2% Salt, 12% Silver
10% Salt, 5% Silver
10% Salt, 12 % Silver

The four types of paper on which those tests were performed were:
A) 100% Rag
B) 400 Series Strathmore water color cold press
C) Carton Bristol board – regular surface texture
D) Strathmore Gemini 140lb- rough

There was a total of 16 tests.  However, when preforming the last tests, (2% salt, 5% Silver) (2% salt, 12%), it was suggested to try a double coat of silver nitrate and so half the strips were coated in a second coat of silver, adding 8 more results to the final total. 

The concentrations were decided in a previous class session and made with distilled water, as tap water can contain chloride which would react with the silver before it is supposed to react on the paper.  With the lights off and the shades drawn in an attempt to prevent premature light reactions on the paper before exposure.  Strips of paper were cut from each type of paper.  One of each type was taped to a board – tape on all sides to help with the natural bubbling of paper when saturated with fluid.  In the end there were four boards with four different strips of paper across them for each test of solution combinations.  On the lower salt concentrations test another piece of paper was placed down the middle to divide each strip into two sections, one for one coat of silver, and one for two coats of silver. 

Salt was applied first. Two lines of salt water from a pipette were drawn across the top of each strip and then with a sponge brush spread across the paper.  The pipette was necessary to prevent contamination as residues from the paper could get into the overall solution if the brush was dipped into it and a reaction could taint the solutions.  The application process of two lines across the top of the strip, going lengthwise, and then spreading it with a sponge brush was used for each application of every solution.  A blow dryer was used to dry each coat between applications.

The following are the observations for each test, with a key for which papers are which.

Key:
A) 100% Rag
B) 400 Series Strathmore water color cold press
C) Carton Bristol board – regular surface texture
D) Strathmore Gemini 140lb- rough

Salt = NaCl
Silver Nitrate = AgNO3

**** Keynote: the less salt and higher silver, the better reaction****

Experiment 1) 2% Salt NaCl & 5% Silver Nitrate  / half of this sample had 2 coats

Observations: Before exposure, Paper A changed.  The second coat of silver turned the darkest brown with uneven distribution on the singular coat.  Paper B had no change before exposure, but after turned a deep purplish color.  Paper C turned a greenish brown before exposure, very pale.  After exposure two coats were dark whereas the singular coat of silver had hardly any change.  Paper D had very little change before exposure.  After exposure, two coats turned dark whereas the singular coat hardly changed at all, though it seems primarily due to uneven distribution of solutions. 

Below, A-D, Bottom to top

Experiment 1 before exposure, two coats applied on left half


Experiment 1 after exposure of five minutes, before fixing the image.  See the uneven exposure when there is only one coat of silver.

Experiment 1 after photo fixing in salt solution, rinsed and air dried with blow dryer.  See faded contrast with fixing immersion.  


Experiment 2) 10% Salt NaCl & 5% Silver Nitrate 

Observations: There were no visible changes before exposure for any paper.  However, after exposure there was limited changes.  Papers A and B had slight yellowing.  Paper C became a light purple tint.  Paper D had the highest level of contrast, an almost purple tint.  Below: Paper strips in the order from top to bottom D-A.
Experiment 2 after five minutes exposure.  See very light change in contrast.


Experiment 3) 2% Salt NaCl & 12% Silver Nitrate / half of this sample had 2 coats

Observations: Paper A turned brown with second coat of silver before light box exposure.  After exposure, second coat darkened whereas singular coat hardly changed.  Paper B turned a very light brown before exposure but remained a light (though darker brown) after exposure.  The singular coat proved to have poor evenness in change.  Paper C turned dark brown, a little orangish, on the second coat of silver before exposure.  After exposure, the colors darkened, however, the singular coat was uneven in distribution and seemed darker than two coats of silver that remained orangier than the single coat.  Paper D turned light brown before exposure on second coat, however, both darkened with exposure to light.  

Below, from left left to right A-D

Experiment 3 before exposure, two coats Silver applied on lower half

Experiment 3 after exposure of five minutes.  Observe darkened sections and lighter sections where objects had blocked the light.  Uneven sensitivity in 1 coat upper section.

Experiment 3 removed from tape and images fixed.  The contrast is diminished in the fixing process.
Experiment 4) 10% Salt NaCl & 12% Silver Nitrate 
(all of these had some contrast)

Observation:  No change before exposure.  After the exposure: A. Little Change, B. Little to NO change, C. Little Change, D. Little Change

Below, A-D, top to bottom

Experiment 4 after five minutes exposure.  See the very light change after exposure.  The increased salt concentration keeps the silver from forming a good photosensitive surface.  


รจ C & D on all tests were, in most cases, wrinkled due to the amount of liquid absorption. Also there seemed to be yellowing of these two papers.

Final conclusion is that with the less salt solution the photosensitive properties increased.  While the higher percentage of silver seemed to get darker images, the lower concentration of silver nitrate mixed with the lower concentration of salt solution seemed to get more even distribution.  After fixing both of the low salt percentage images, regardless of low or high silver solution percentage, the images seem to be the same quality.  The higher silver concentrated solution with the salt, however would be the best in future experimentation.  It is the best to use two coats of silver nitrate as well.  One coat fails to provide an even distribution. 

love-in-a-mist photo by Ian Talbot

Websites (sources and further interest): 

Monday, March 21, 2011

experimenting with anthotypes

March 9th, 2011
Anthotype Experimentation

Hypothesis:
The addition of other elements (water, alcohol, paprika) to blackberry juice will alter the photosensitivity and resulting contrast of the Anthotypes. 

Procedure:
About 1 ½ cup of blackberries were mashed with a mortar and pestle, then strained through to remove the pulp.  The juice was then divided into four containers, one with only juice, one with water (1/4 cup), one with alcohol (1/4 cup) and one with 1/8 cup of a water-paprika mixture.  Another mixture was made without blackberries consisting only of approximately 2 tsp. paprika and a cup of water (an 1/8 of which was used in the blackberry juice mixture), resulting in five experiments. 

Using foam brushes, the mixtures were painted onto five individual pages that were taped to a table.  The tape provided a white edge to know the contrast of dye and paper.  After applying the mixtures, we discovered that the blackberry juice may have been better if strained through a coffee filter to further remove the fleshy bits of the berry. 

Each page will be exposed to light for a period of approximately seven weeks.  Every two weeks, the pages will be taken down and observations recorded. 

Observations:   
Experiment
In Applying
3/24/11
4/7/11
4/21/11
Paprika w/water
Is streaky in applying.  Drying leaves a orangey color.  (water droplets across page when splashed with water on accident
No changes visible


Blackberry


Streaky w/ bits left on page.  Also splashed with water accidently leaving pale droplet spots on a nice fairly dark purple.
No data reported at this time.


Blackberry w/Paprika
Very streaky when applied, containing bits of blackberry flesh and paprika bits.  Bubbled the papers a bit.  Drying rusty orangey brown, changing darker rusty brown when dried completely.
No data reported at this time.


Blackberry with water
Bubbly water droplet type look, inconsistent covering, streaky and not even.  Bubble the paper, purplish pink, lighter than just blackberry.
Very little change observed


Blackberry w/alcohol
Seemed to saturate paper better, but bubbled with how much moisture seeped into the page.  Did not apply in even coats, though not streaky, there are darker tones of purple and lighter pink spots, varying w/strokes.
Very little change observed



This experiment is still on going and will be updated periodically. 

Saturday, March 19, 2011

anthotypes


sp_grevillearobustrubus-b.jpgWhat are they?
Sir John Herchel
        Images can be created through the use of photosensitive plant extractions painted on to a sheet of paper, dried, and then placing an object over top the paper.  When placed in the sunlight, the light bleaches away and fades the color not covered by the object creating a silhouette type negative image.  This is called an Anthotype.   
                Anthotypes were invented in 1842 Sir John Herschel, though the photosensitivity of plant extractions had been acknowledged and experimented with since 1816 by Henri August Vogel.  However, images required several days in the sunlight, sometimes longer depending on the light intensity and type of juice used, to produce an image and would fade when exposed to any sunlight after the removal of the object.  Without any commercial uses, Anthotypes were fairly ignored throughout history by being known as impractical.

 

  How are they made?
              Take any photosensitive plant with a desired color and crush them up in order to extract the necessary fluids.  Juices from fruits like raspberries and blackberries work.  Petals or leaves as well.  The fluids can be combined or used separately, depending on what a person may desire for color.  Strain the juices through a cheese cloth or strainer – just filter it in any manner so that the pulp or flesh of the plant does not come through with the juice; streaks or pieces will be left on the paper if not properly strained. If there isn't a lot of juice, some distilled water (as regular water may alter the delicate photo-sensitivity of the juices) or alcohol can be added to juices, but be careful of diluting it too much.  
                Once strained, paint the emulsion on paper.  Two to three coats have been said to work best at least.  Then dry the paper.  While it is suggested to dry it in a dark room, the length of time required to make an image is quite long and therefore not completely necessary to take such a precautions. 
sp_solanum_margin_iris-b.jpg
fresh leaf anthotype
     Once the paper has dried, place the object over the paper and place in direct sunlight.  Any object may be used.  Leaves were common, though a fresh leaf from the tree has the tendency to sweat and create an x-ray sort of look as the water leaks out and dilutes the emulsion on the paper.
     The sun naturally moves across the sky and creates shadows so unless the object is completely flat, shadowed areas will effect the outcome of the image.
      Transparencies can be placed over top the photosensitive paper as well.  Printing out a photo negative can allow a scene more familiar with traditional photography, such as a landscape.  
Lion Statue Anthotype
    
Some websites:
http://193.166.40.90/?cat=18 - an artist's experimentation and results, including the lion statue.
http://www.alternativephotography.com/wp/processes/anthotypes/working-with-anthotypes - an individual's experience and notes on working with anthotypes, as well as some suggestions on sources of plant extracts
http://www.alternativephotography.com/wp/processes/anthotypes/anthotype-process - some information on the process and history of anthotypes
http://www.kevinlongino.com/portfolio.cfm?a=39&p=131&t=collector - artist using anthotypes